5/2/2023 0 Comments Economix bruce bartlett![]() ![]() “He’s an influential ideas man in the Bush administration” ( Had Enough? , p. Says radio broadcaster Rush Limbaugh, “You know that feeling you get when you learn something that ‘turns the light on?’ That’s how you will react to every Bruce Bartlett column.”Įven Democratic strategist James Carville acknowledges Bartlett’s influence. According to Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter David Cay Johnston, Bartlett’s writings “are closely followed in Washington” (New York Times, 9-13-04). In fact, Bartlett’s columns are a “must read” for anyone interested in politics and economic policy. His work is read-and used in arguments-by almost everyone involved in economic policy in the administration.” Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers (2001-2003), has said: “Bartlett’s insightful and thought-provoking analyses of tax issues and the economic outlook are always in time for White House discussions and decisions. Glenn Hubbard, former chairman of President George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy(Doubleday, 2006), garnered national attention months before publication and his weekly column was the most widely read on economics by policymakers at the White House and in Congress.Īs R. His New York Times best-seller, Impostor: How George W. There are many ways to reduce spending to help attain long run fiscal health they should not be ignored.Bruce Bartlett is one of the most influential writers in Washington today. Said institutions and the ‘education system’ as a whole are. Of course, the fact that the vast majority of architects and enablers of the financial and economic crises have degrees from our allegedly elite education institutions show how overrated and generally useless Spending should be directed to individual citizens in the form of vouchers or another method that gives them full control of the dollars(and makes institutions compete for students) this would provide an avenueįor ensuring that any subsidy goes only to American citizens, freeing up more ‘education’ capacity-and lowering prices-as foreigners are elinminated from the ‘educational system’. Welfare for higher ‘education’ is another area ripe for saving money. Including both actual spending(Ex-Im Bank, etc.) and tax favoritism(the witless new house buyer credits, etc.). ![]() Another big slice of useless spending can be found in corporate subsidy, Of NATO and other ‘alliances’) and that they have to actually learn to get along with each other, at least at arms-length. A great side effect of theses spending cuts would be to put other nations on notice that they are responsible for their own defense(we’d be out Returning to a true defense orientation in the military. The types and forms of governmental spending that goes on, they’s easily see many areas to reduce or eliminate.Īn important area of savings would be ending the ’empire’ spending and Gardner does in the initial statement, shows an unwillingness to face reality and is wrong on its face-if Americans actually saw all ![]() And simply trying to avoid the topic from the outset, as Mr. Bartlett’s discussion is useful, simply running away from spending cuts is useless and even rather cowardly-there must be real reduction of governmental spending to get any real long-termįiscal balance. I think a broad-based new government benefit should be financed with a broad-based tax that is to a largeĮxtent paid by the beneficiaries, as is the case with Social Security. Gross domestic product on health as most other major countries without getting much in return for the extra spending.įinally, I think the goal of universal coverage is a good one, but the Obama proposal is not properly financed. I also believe the administration has done a poor job of addressing what I think is the biggest problem with the American health case system: it costs too much for what we get. Secondly, I thought its proposals were ill thought-through and that it would have been better to take the time to develop something more coherent, rather than making things up on the fly, which appears to be the case. I just thought it was unwise for the Obama administration to take it up while the economy was in the tank.įor both political and substantive reasons, I thought it should have focused like a laser beam on the economy and related issues like reform of the financial sector.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |